Avenclave is in development. There is nothing to download yet.

Avenclave
Who this is for

One person, several professional identities.

The common thread is not company size or industry. It is that you hold calendars that belong to different organizations, none of which will ever be merged, and all of which need to know when you are already committed.

  • Fractional executives

    A CFO or CTO seat at three companies means three tenants, three mailboxes, and three calendars that each believe they own your week.

  • Independent consultants

    Each client issues you an account. Each account schedules against you as though it were the only one.

  • Contractors and advisors

    Short engagements accumulate. So do the calendars, and so does the chance that two of them book the same hour.

  • Board members

    Board calendars are sparse but immovable. A conflict discovered late is expensive in a way an ordinary meeting is not.

  • People with two employers

    Two organizations, two policies, and no appetite on either side for the other to see meeting details.

  • Anyone separating work and personal

    The pattern is the same, even when the second calendar is not a job.

The alternatives

Three things people do today, and what each one costs.

These are approaches rather than products. Each is a reasonable response to the problem; each gives up something Avenclave is designed not to.

Block the time yourself

What works

Correct on the day you do it.

What it costs

It stops being correct the moment a meeting moves, and nothing tells you which copies are now wrong. The work never ends and the errors are silent.

Share one calendar with the other organization

What works

One place to look.

What it costs

You are exposing one client’s meetings to another, which is usually not information you are entitled to share. It also normally needs someone’s administrator to agree.

Full two-way calendar sync

What works

Nothing is missed.

What it costs

It copies titles, attendees, notes, and links into an organization that has no business holding them. The confidentiality problem gets worse, not better.

The distinction

Availability synchronization is a smaller problem than calendar synchronization.

Calendar synchronization

Tries to make two calendars hold the same events. It has to reconcile titles, attendees, invitations, responses, recurrence, and permissions, and it can only do that by moving confidential content between organizations.

Availability synchronization

Only makes each calendar agree about when you are unavailable. There is far less to get wrong, nothing confidential in transit, and a much smaller surface for the product to be trusted with.

Avenclave deliberately does the second one, and does not aspire to the first.

Non-goals

What Avenclave is choosing not to become.

Focus is the reason the privacy claim can stay simple. Each of these would require Avenclave to hold more of your information than it does now.

  • A calendar application, or a replacement for Outlook or Google Calendar
  • A scheduling assistant or booking page
  • A meeting platform
  • A productivity suite
  • A team or company-wide availability service
  • A cloud service that holds a copy of your schedule

Want to know when Avenclave is ready?

There is no signup form and no tracking. Send one email and we will reply once there is something real to try. Nothing else happens to your address.

Email hello@avenclave.com

We will not add you to a mailing list, and we will not share your address.