Block the time yourself
Correct on the day you do it.
It stops being correct the moment a meeting moves, and nothing tells you which copies are now wrong. The work never ends and the errors are silent.
Every existing way of keeping multiple professional calendars consistent asks you to give up one of the two. Avenclave exists because the useful part of a meeting — the fact that you are unavailable — is also the only part the other calendar needs.
The common thread is not company size or industry. It is that you hold calendars that belong to different organizations, none of which will ever be merged, and all of which need to know when you are already committed.
A CFO or CTO seat at three companies means three tenants, three mailboxes, and three calendars that each believe they own your week.
Each client issues you an account. Each account schedules against you as though it were the only one.
Short engagements accumulate. So do the calendars, and so does the chance that two of them book the same hour.
Board calendars are sparse but immovable. A conflict discovered late is expensive in a way an ordinary meeting is not.
Two organizations, two policies, and no appetite on either side for the other to see meeting details.
The pattern is the same, even when the second calendar is not a job.
These are approaches rather than products. Each is a reasonable response to the problem; each gives up something Avenclave is designed not to.
Correct on the day you do it.
It stops being correct the moment a meeting moves, and nothing tells you which copies are now wrong. The work never ends and the errors are silent.
One place to look.
You are exposing one client’s meetings to another, which is usually not information you are entitled to share. It also normally needs someone’s administrator to agree.
Nothing is missed.
It copies titles, attendees, notes, and links into an organization that has no business holding them. The confidentiality problem gets worse, not better.
Tries to make two calendars hold the same events. It has to reconcile titles, attendees, invitations, responses, recurrence, and permissions, and it can only do that by moving confidential content between organizations.
Only makes each calendar agree about when you are unavailable. There is far less to get wrong, nothing confidential in transit, and a much smaller surface for the product to be trusted with.
Avenclave deliberately does the second one, and does not aspire to the first.
Focus is the reason the privacy claim can stay simple. Each of these would require Avenclave to hold more of your information than it does now.
There is no signup form and no tracking. Send one email and we will reply once there is something real to try. Nothing else happens to your address.
We will not add you to a mailing list, and we will not share your address.